All About Jazz

Home » News » Advocacy

Dear All About Jazz Readers,

If you're familiar with All About Jazz, you know that we've dedicated over two decades to supporting jazz as an art form, and more importantly, the creative musicians who make it. Our enduring commitment has made All About Jazz one of the most culturally important websites of its kind in the world reaching hundreds of thousands of readers every month. However, to expand our offerings and develop new means to foster jazz discovery we need your help.

You can become a sustaining member for a modest $20 and in return, we'll immediately hide those pesky Google ads PLUS deliver exclusive content and provide access to future articles for a full year! This combination will not only improve your AAJ experience, it will allow us to continue to rigorously build on the great work we first started in 1995. Read on to view our project ideas...

1

Future of Music Coalition Says Digital Music Respect Act Does Not Go Far Enough

SOURCE:

Sign in to view read count
The full text of the FoMC statement:

Proposed legislation is a step in the right direction, but doesn't go far enough.

Today, Representatives George Holding (R-NC) and John Conyers (D-MI), will introduce the RESPECT Act, a bill meant to create a limited performance right for the use of sound recordings by satellite and Internet radio companies.

Under current law, there is no federal copyright for recordings made before February 15, 1972. Where rights exist at all, these recordings are subject to a patchwork of highly variable state laws and statutes. The lack of federal protection leaves pre-’72 recording artists without a reliable means of compensation and services vulnerable to legal action, as evidenced by recording industry lawsuits against Sirius/XM and Pandora.

The following statement is attributed to Casey Rae, VP of Policy and Education for Future of Music Coalition (FMC), a national non-profit research, education and advocacy organization for musicians:

“We are pleased that members of Congress recognize the importance of compensating recording artists for the use of their work, especially those artists who have already contributed so much to musical culture. Unfortunately, this bill doesn’t offer performers the full suite of rights afforded to artists who made recordings after February 15, 1972.

“The bigger labels have pushed to keep recordings from older artists out of the scope of federal copyright for reasons that defy logic. Maybe they want big damages and to set new legal precedent. Maybe they don’t want the hassle of identifying recordings that they actually own, because then they’d have to pay other artist royalties. Maybe they want to continue to pretend that creators aren’t eligible to reclaim their copyrights under federal law.

“This stopgap bill is a step in the right direction. But with trade industry groups like the RIAA stating on record that we need to simplify current copyright law, adding scaffolding to an already unwieldy structure may not be the best way to ensure artist compensation across the board.

“Make no mistake about it: recording artists should be paid for the use of their work. And the best way to do this is for Congress to follow the recommendations of the United States Copyright Office and federalize pre-’72 copyrights.”

Continue Reading...

This story appears courtesy of HypeBot.
Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved.

Tags

News

Sponsored announcements from the industry.